Skip to content

[Docs] Add lifecycle verification GAP report and remediation blocks - #1626

Merged
edelauna merged 24 commits into
mainfrom
feature/lifecycle-formal-verification-0ebv6vfh08pal
Sep 19, 2026
Merged

edelauna merged 24 commits into
mainfrom
feature/lifecycle-formal-verification-0ebv6vfh08pal

Conversation

@zoomote

@zoomote zoomote Bot commented Sep 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

​Created by Roomote. Follow up by mentioning @roomote, in the web UI, or in Discord.

What changed

  • Added an exhaustive-but-qualified lifecycle GAP report covering state owners, persistence, scheduling, delegation, streams/events, and tool-state boundaries.
  • Ranked 38 findings under stable LIFE-GAP-* IDs and grouped them into eight remediation workstreams with complexity, engineering risk, dependencies, critical path, parallel workstreams, and closure evidence.
  • Added a 1-SP remediation block register with exact ownership for every LIFE-GAP-001..038; dependencies reference shared prerequisites without duplicating ownership.
  • Added four separately named optional FANOUT-BLK-* blocks outside serial baseline closure.
  • Kept planned two-sibling fan-out outside the baseline CI command while retaining its explicit optional checker.
  • Reconciled merged PR fix(delegation): read task-local mode in getEnvironmentDetails and validateToolUse #1625: environment details, built-in validation, and custom-tool execution are now documented as focused production-tested readers. The delegated-reader checker is explicitly proxy refinement evidence and does not execute those readers; the wider reader inventory remains open.
  • Removed all engineer-day and duration estimates; blocks and clusters use only review scope, relative complexity, risk, dependencies, implementation shape, and objective evidence.

Why this change was made

The remediation backlog needs increments small enough to review and launch without pretending shared primitives are independent or converting story points into duration estimates. The audit also separates production-tested reader fixes from selector/proxy evidence so green model output is not overstated.

Impact

There is no production or UI behavior change in this PR. Current main runtime and tests, including merged #1625, are preserved. The baseline lifecycle command now includes the upstream delegated-reader refinement check, while optional fan-out remains separately runnable.

Related PRs

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change StackReview Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: Zoo-Code-Org/Zoo-Code/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: e984b8f5-ae8d-428b-8c71-c09d6f91e2f6

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 26e1f36 and 9cafe8f.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • docs/architecture/task-lifecycle-gap-report.md
  • docs/architecture/task-lifecycle-model.md
  • scripts/check-task-fanout-protocol.ts

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 4 included reviews per hour; 3 remain after this review.

📜 Recent review details
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
Check strict typing and exhaustive behavior across normal, boundary, error, cancellation, retry, and compatibility paths.

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

Files:

  • scripts/check-task-fanout-protocol.ts
Act as an adversarial second-opinion reviewer.

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

Files:

  • scripts/check-task-fanout-protocol.ts
  • docs/architecture/task-lifecycle-gap-report.md
  • docs/architecture/task-lifecycle-model.md

📝 Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a task fan-out protocol model checker covering reachable states, safety rules, expected actions, and known failure scenarios.
    • Added a command to run fan-out protocol checks.
    • Expanded provider handoff verification to confirm task-local execution modes are preserved.
  • Documentation

    • Added a comprehensive lifecycle verification gap report and remediation register.
    • Clarified lifecycle model boundaries, coverage requirements, failure semantics, fan-out behavior, and audit criteria.
    • Added links connecting related lifecycle and protocol documentation.

Walkthrough

The pull request expands lifecycle-model documentation, adds a 38-gap audit and remediation register, introduces bounded fan-out verification, registers its npm script, and adds a provider handoff witness for task-local mode selection.

Changes

Lifecycle verification

Layer / File(s) Summary
Lifecycle model and gap audit
docs/architecture/task-lifecycle-model.md, docs/architecture/task-lifecycle-gap-report.md, docs/architecture/native-tool-call-parser-scoping-model.md, docs/architecture/task-cleanup-protocol-model.md
The documentation defines lifecycle coverage, evidence classes, 38 ranked gaps, audit limits, and links between related models.
Lifecycle remediation register
docs/architecture/task-lifecycle-remediation-blocks.md
The register maps LIFE-GAP-001 through LIFE-GAP-038 to bounded remediation blocks, production mappings, verification evidence, dependencies, and acceptance criteria.
Fan-out protocol model check
scripts/check-task-fanout-protocol.ts, package.json
A bounded breadth-first checker explores two-child fan-out states, validates invariants and known invalid states, and is exposed through a new npm script.
Provider handoff witness
scripts/check-provider-handoff-scheduler.ts
The provider handoff check verifies that task-local mode does not resolve to the shared provider mode and reports the witness in its summary.

Priority: ➖ Normal

Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~30 minutes

Change: Other · Severity of issue fixed: Medium


Caution

Pre-merge checks failed

Please resolve all errors before merging. Addressing warnings is optional.

  • Ignore (reviewers only)

❌ Failed checks (1 error, 1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Out of Scope Changes check ❌ Error The task-lifecycle-gap-report.md report, 38-item remediation register, broad lifecycle model updates, and check-task-fanout-protocol.ts address lifecycle audit and two-child fan-out work. These ch… Move the lifecycle gap report, remediation register, broad lifecycle model updates, and optional fan-out checker to a separate pull request. Retain the task-local reader implementation, focused tests, delegated-reader checker, and directly …
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description explains the main changes, rationale, impact, and related PR. However, it omits the required Related GitHub Issue, Test Procedure, Pre-Submission Checklist, Documentation Updates, and … Add the required template sections. Provide an approved issue reference, test commands and verification steps, completed checklist items, documentation impact, and reviewer contact details.
✅ Passed checks (6 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Issue #1625 requires task-local mode reads in getEnvironmentDetails, validateToolUse, and custom tool execution in presentAssistantMessage. The reviewed head includes these corrected readers, fo…
Regression Evidence ✅ Passed No runtime or UI behavior changes are introduced. The changed executable content is verification code and one package script. check-provider-handoff-scheduler.ts adds a focused assertion that a requ…
Security Boundaries ✅ Passed No changed path matches the security failure conditions. The authoritative diff changes documentation, adds the static fanout-protocol:model-check package script, and adds bounded model assertions i…
Persistence Integrity ✅ Passed No changed persistence path exists. The authoritative diff changes only Markdown, package.json, scripts/check-provider-handoff-scheduler.ts, and the new in-memory `scripts/check-task-fanout-protoc…
Lifecycle Resource Cleanup ✅ Passed No changed concrete lifecycle path meets the failure condition. The pull request adds documentation, an opt-in fanout-protocol:model-check command, and abstract state-model transitions. The new chec…
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the main changes: the lifecycle verification gap report and remediation blocks.
Full details: Out of Scope Changes check

Explanation

The task-lifecycle-gap-report.md report, 38-item remediation register, broad lifecycle model updates, and check-task-fanout-protocol.ts address lifecycle audit and two-child fan-out work. These changes do not implement or verify the three task-local reader requirements in issue #1625. The optional fan-out command is also outside baseline CI.

Resolution

Move the lifecycle gap report, remediation register, broad lifecycle model updates, and optional fan-out checker to a separate pull request. Retain the task-local reader implementation, focused tests, delegated-reader checker, and directly supporting documentation.

Full details: Description check

Explanation

The description explains the main changes, rationale, impact, and related PR. However, it omits the required Related GitHub Issue, Test Procedure, Pre-Submission Checklist, Documentation Updates, and Get in Touch sections.

  • Fix all pre-merge checks with AI
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review status

This PR was opened by an automated account. A human maintainer must verify the change intent, provenance, and validation before merging.

Current step: Address automated review findings and push fixes.

After fixes are pushed and required CI passes, automated review restarts.

Review-state labels are managed by this workflow; do not edit them manually.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@zoomote

zoomote Bot commented Sep 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Reconciled #1626 with #1623 and runtime-fix PR #1625 in commit fed91bb86. The checker now claims only selector/write-side coverage, retains a divergent task/provider-mode witness for the downstream obligation, and the traceability docs and PR description explicitly assign environment/tool reader correctness to #1625. pnpm lifecycle:model-check, typechecking, lint, and the full test suite pass; no UI proof applies.

@zoomote zoomote Bot changed the title [Chore] Formalize remaining task lifecycle issue protocols [Chore] Formalize fan-out and trace delegated mode readers Sep 13, 2026
@zoomote

zoomote Bot commented Sep 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Completed the lifecycle coverage audit in commit 70d7ac60a. Every protocol area and issue row now states its evidence class, production/model relationship, bounds, omitted consumers, and remaining obligations; passed is explicitly defined as bounded success rather than issue closure. README now links the authoritative tracker, and child model docs link back to its audit. pnpm lifecycle:model-check, typechecking, lint, and the full test suite pass; visual proof is not applicable.

@zoomote zoomote Bot changed the title [Chore] Formalize fan-out and trace delegated mode readers [Chore] Audit and formalize task lifecycle verification Sep 13, 2026
@zoomote

zoomote Bot commented Sep 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Completed the live-state traceability re-audit in commit 48644f714. Retained open #1469, #1021, #1623, #369/#372, and #612 because production or enforcement gaps remain. Moved closed #1453/#1279, #921, #920, and #1468 to verified history, preserving all bounded/proxy limitations and redirecting adjacent open risks to their active issues. pnpm lifecycle:model-check, typechecking, lint, and the full test suite pass; visual proof is not applicable.

@zoomote

zoomote Bot commented Sep 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Re-scoped #1626 to documentation/formal-model audit only at 20aebc49f. All runtime, shared-type, scheduler, production-test, and Zoo-Code-Docs changes introduced during the attempted implementation were reverted; the net PR diff contains only architecture docs, model-check scripts, and command wiring. The root README has no lifecycle tracker link. pnpm lifecycle:model-check, typechecking, and lint pass; visual proof is not applicable.

@zoomote zoomote Bot changed the title [Chore] Audit and formalize task lifecycle verification [Docs] Audit task lifecycle verification gaps Sep 13, 2026
@zoomote

zoomote Bot commented Sep 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Completed the repository-wide lifecycle-verification GAP report in 8d00b944f. It inventories lifecycle owners, persistence/mutation/queue/delegation/stream/event boundaries, copied vocabulary, tests/models/CI, and ranks 34 stable LIFE-GAP-* items with severity, confidence, impact, witnesses, dependencies, and objective closure criteria. Primary TLA+, Quint, Alloy, Jepsen, and SQLite references are translated into repository-specific audit rules. Formatting, relative link targets, pnpm lifecycle:model-check, typechecking, and lint pass; scope remains documentation/formal-model-only and visual proof is not applicable.

@zoomote zoomote Bot changed the title [Docs] Audit task lifecycle verification gaps [Docs] Add exhaustive task lifecycle verification GAP report Sep 13, 2026
@zoomote

zoomote Bot commented Sep 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Completed the subtask todo audit in 378abeeb5. Normal creation does not copy the parent list: child todos are explicit model-supplied new_task.todos, parsed into a fresh list and forwarded as initialTodos. The distinct IDE-side gap is that initial todos are process-local and disappear on rehydration before the first persisted update_todo_list; no existing model covers todo ownership, publication scoping, or rehydration equivalence. Added LIFE-GAP-035 with reproduction controls, impact, boundary, and objective closure criteria. Formatting, pnpm lifecycle:model-check, typechecking, and lint pass; no runtime or UI changes were made.

@zoomote

zoomote Bot commented Sep 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Completed the tool-state ownership audit in 63150c68e. LIFE-GAP-035 now covers durable tool-originated child initialization, with initial todo loss as its confirmed witness; distinct 036038 cover uncorrelated approval edits, singleton partial-handler state, and lossy tool-ID correspondence across persistence/execution/replay. PR #1625's mode bug can influence prompt/validation and therefore model output indirectly, but no production path transfers parent todos based on mode. No new green checker was added because these boundaries lack faithful unified production transitions; explicit witness/closure criteria are retained instead. Formatting, link targets, pnpm lifecycle:model-check, typechecking, and lint pass.

@zoomote

zoomote Bot commented Sep 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Completed the portfolio remediation plan in 7ea3edd9e. All 38 gaps are assigned to eight root-cause programs with calibrated effort/risk, subsystem ownership, dependencies, objective evidence, safe consolidation boundaries, critical path, four parallel workstreams, quick wins, architectural programs, and a first tranche. Recommended serial-contract portfolio scale is 85–145 engineer-days; full fan-out is 105–175. Formatting, link targets, pnpm lifecycle:model-check, typechecking, and lint pass; scope remains documentation/model-only.

@zoomote zoomote Bot changed the title [Docs] Add exhaustive task lifecycle verification GAP report [Docs] Add lifecycle verification GAP report and remediation portfolio Sep 13, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the awaiting-coderabbit Waiting for CodeRabbit to approve the latest commit label Sep 19, 2026

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pre-merge checks failed. Please resolve the failing checks before merging.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added awaiting-author PR is waiting for the author to address requested changes and removed coderabbit-review-active Required CI passed; CodeRabbit review is active awaiting-coderabbit Waiting for CodeRabbit to approve the latest commit labels Sep 19, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added coderabbit-review-active Required CI passed; CodeRabbit review is active awaiting-coderabbit Waiting for CodeRabbit to approve the latest commit and removed awaiting-author PR is waiting for the author to address requested changes labels Sep 19, 2026
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai Bot previously requested changes Sep 19, 2026

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pre-merge checks failed. Please resolve the failing checks before merging.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added awaiting-author PR is waiting for the author to address requested changes and removed coderabbit-review-active Required CI passed; CodeRabbit review is active awaiting-coderabbit Waiting for CodeRabbit to approve the latest commit labels Sep 19, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

awaiting-author PR is waiting for the author to address requested changes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants